Author(s): Korte KJ, Capron DW, Zvolensky M, Schmidt NB
Despite widespread use, considerable literature has shown that the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND; Heatherton, Kozlowski, Frecker, & Fagerström, 1991) has questionable psychometric properties, generally reflecting relatively poor properties of reliability and validity. One factor that may be affecting the psychometric qualities of the scale is the use of a dichotomous, forced-choice response format for certain items, in which respondents are asked to answer each question with a Yes or No response. This scoring approach is especially problematic when used to measure dimensional constructs, such as nicotine dependence, in which a dimensional construct is forced into a categorical construct. The purpose of the current study was to examine whether revising the response format utilized in the FTND would lead to an enhancement in the psychometric properties of this scale. This question was examined by removing the forced-choice response criteria on items 2, 5, and 6 of the FTND and revising the response options to reflect a 4-point Likert response set (0 = never, 1 = sometimes, 2 = most of the time, 3 = always). Participants consisted of 343 smokers from the community. Results revealed that the revised scoring approach resulted in a significant incremental improvement in scale reliability and enhanced convergent validity, showing a stronger association with smoking outcomes than the FTQ or FTND. Findings are discussed in terms of recommendations for scale revision and usage.
Referred From: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23254226
Author(s): Palfai TP, Monti PM, Ostafin B, Hutchison K
Author(s): Harrison EL, Hinson RE, McKee SA
Author(s): Howell A, Leyro T, Hogan J, Buckner J, Zvolensky M
Author(s): Krukowski RA, Solomon LJ, Naud S
Author(s): Reed MB, Wang R, Shillington AM, Clapp JD, Lange JE
Author(s): Hughes JR, Kalman D
Author(s): Hurt RD, Offord KP, Croghan IT, Gomez-Dahl L, Kottke TE, et al.
Author(s): Lisha NE, Carmody TP2, Humfleet GL2, Delucchi KL2
Author(s): Taylor B, Rehm J
Author(s): Jarvis CM, Hayman LL, Braun LT, Schwertz DW, Ferrans CE, et al.
Author(s): Joseph AM, Willenbring ML, Nugent SM, Nelson DB
Author(s): Kodl M, Fu SS, Joseph AM
Author(s): Fu S, Kodl M, Willenbring M, Nelson D, Nugent S, et al.
Author(s): Holt LJ, Litt MD, Cooney NL
Author(s): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
Author(s): Irving LM, Seidner AL, Burling TA, Thomas RG, Brenner GF
Author(s): Macnee CL, Talsma A
Author(s): Orleans CT, Rimer BK, Cristinzio S, Keintz MK, Fleisher L
Author(s): Asher MK, Martin RA, Rohsenow DJ, MacKinnon S, Traficante R, et al.
Author(s): Martin RA, Rohsenow DJ, MacKinnon SV, Abrams DB, Monti PM
Author(s): Velicer WF, DiClemente CC, Prochaska JO, Brandenburg N
Author(s): DiClemente CC, Prochaska JO
Author(s): Curry SJ, Grothaus L, McBride C
Author(s): Baha M, Le Faou AL
Author(s): Curry SJ, McBride C, Grothaus LC, Louie D, Wagner EH
Author(s): Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, de la Fuente JR, Grant M
Author(s): Brown RA, Lejuez CW, Kahler CW, Strong DR
Author(s): Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, FagerstrÃ¶m KO
Author(s): Pomerleau CS, Carton SM, Lutzke ML, Flessland KA, Pomerleau OF
Author(s): Filbey FM, Claus E, Audette AR, Niculescu M, Banich MT, et al.
Author(s): Fleming MF, Barry KL, MacDonald R
Author(s): Cherpitel CJ
Author(s): Macnee CL, Talsma A
Author(s): Curry S, Wagner EH, Grothaus LC
Author(s): McBride CM, Pollak KI, Bepler G, Lyna P, Lipkus IM, et al.
Author(s): Bonn-Miller MO, Zvolensky MJ
Author(s): Buckner JD, Zvolensky MJ, Schmidt NB
Author(s): Agrawal A, Budney AJ, Lynskey MT
Author(s): Degenhardt L, Hall W, Lynskey M
Author(s): Wilson SJ, Creswell KG, Sayette MA, Fiez JA
Author(s): Schane RE, Glantz SA, Ling PM
Author(s): DaniJA, De Biasi M
Author(s): Nestler EJ
Author(s): Ehrman RN, Robbins SJ, Bromwell MA, Lankford ME, Monterosso JR, et al.
Author(s): Wiers RW, Rinck M, Kordts R, Houben K, Strack F