The impact of improving outcomes guidance on surgical management of vulval squamous cell cancer in southwest England (1997-2002)

Author(s): Falconer AD, Hirschowitz L, Weeks J, Murdoch J; South West Gynaecology Tumour Panel

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the impact of reorganisation of gynaecological services in southwest England following adoption of regionally agreed evidence-based guidelines and publication of the National Improving Outcomes Guidance in 1999.

Design: Prospective audit with cross-checking against histological reports.

Setting: All 19 acute hospitals in the four Cancer Networks of southwest England.

Sample: All subjects with squamous or verrucous vulval cancer diagnosed between 1997 and 2002.

Method: A one-page minimum data set proforma agreed by the South West Gynaecology Tumour Panel was completed by surgeons after treatment of each patient, and was sent to South West Cancer Intelligence Service for entry, collation and analysis. Data are presented for the years 1997 to 2002 inclusive, and comparisons were made between each of the three 2-year cohorts.

Main outcome measures: These are standards derived from the guidance.

Results: There were 436 squamous or verrucous vulval cancers registered. Recording of staging was missing in 20% of subjects. The percentage of subjects operated upon by lead gynaecological cancer surgeons increased from 78% in cohort 1 to 93% in cohort 3 (P < 0.001). There is a trend towards more conservative operations, which have lower co-morbidity. High activity surgeons achieved better rates of tumour-free skin margins, but even these were adequate only in 49% of operations. Lymphadenectomy rates did not follow guidance.

Conclusion: Centralisation of care of this rare cancer should continue, but specialists need to increase their efforts to ensure adequate skin margins and lymphadenectomy rates while balancing morbidity and the likelihood of recurrence in both fit and frail patients.

Similar Articles

Trends in the incidence of invasive and in situ vulvar carcinoma

Author(s): Judson PL, Habermann EB, Baxter NN, Durham SB, Virnig BA

New aspects of vulvar cancer: changes in localization and age of onset

Author(s): Hampl M, Deckers-Figiel S, Hampl JA, Rein D, Bender HG

Groin dissection practices among gynecologic oncologists treating early vulvar cancer

Author(s): Levenback C, Morris M, Burke TW, Gershenson DM, Wolf JK, et al.

A proposed glossary of terminology related to the surgical treatment of vulvar carcinoma

Author(s): Micheletti L, Preti M, Zola P, Zanotto Valentino MC, Bocci C, et al.

FIGO staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynecologic cancers

Author(s): Benedet JL, Bender H, Jones H 3rd, Ngan HY, Pecorelli S

Carcinoma of the vulva

Author(s): Rutledge F, Smith JP, Franklin EW

Squamous carcinoma of the vulva: results of treatment, 1938 to 1976

Author(s): Benedet JL, Turko M, Fairey RN, Boyes DA

Changing trends in the surgical treatment of invasive carcinoma of the vulva

Author(s): Cavanagh D, Roberts WS, Bryson SC, Marsden DE, Ingram JM, et al.

Management of regional lymph nodes and their prognostic influence in vulvar cancer

Author(s): Hacker NF, Berek JS, Lagasse LD, Leuchter RS, Moore JG

Squamous vulvar cancer: a clinically based individualization of treatment

Author(s): Rodolakis A, Diakomanolis E, Voulgaris Z, Akrivos T, Vlachos G, et al.

Clinical and pathological prognostic factors in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva

Author(s): Raspagliesi F, Hanozet F, Ditto A, Solima E, Zanaboni F, et al.

Carcinoma of the vulva

Author(s): Beller U, Quinn MA, Benedet JL, Creasman WT, Ngan HY

Changes in the management of vulval cancer

Author(s): Dhar KK, Woolas RP

Individualization of treatment for stage I squamous cell vulvar carcinoma

Author(s): Hacker NF, Berek JS, Lagasse LD, Nieberg RK, Leuchter RS