Squamous vulvar cancer: a clinically based individualization of treatment

Author(s): Rodolakis A, Diakomanolis E, Voulgaris Z, Akrivos T, Vlachos G, et al.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate treatment results in 211 patients with previously untreated squamous cell vulvar cancer who were primary managed by surgery at the Gynecologic Oncology Unit of Alexandra Hospital, in terms of en bloc radical vulvectomy (N = 105), modified radical vulvectomy with three different incisions technique (N = 60), and radical hemivulvectomy (N = 46) with inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy.

Methods: The surgical stage of disease, nodal status, lesion location and focality, marginal status, tumor size, physical and performance status, surgical modality used, and finally complications and recurrence rates were the analyzed factors for both survival and disease remission.

Results: The overall 5-year survival was 70.1%. The 5-year survival for node-positive patients was 53.8% versus 79.7% for node-negative patients. Unifocal lesions had a 5-year survival of 76% compared with 50% of multifocal lesions. Posterolateral lesions had a better 5-year survival than that of anterior central lesions (79.5% vs 54. 4%). The marginal status of the surgical specimen was a significant predictor of both survival and recurrence. There was a significant difference in complications related to the en bloc radical vulvectomy in terms of wound breakdown, infection, and wound cellulitis.

Conclusions: Modified radical procedures are equally effective with the en bloc radical vulvectomy for the management of early (stage I/II) vulvar cancer. In advanced disease concervative surgery in an individualized approach could also effectively be applied.

Similar Articles

Trends in the incidence of invasive and in situ vulvar carcinoma

Author(s): Judson PL, Habermann EB, Baxter NN, Durham SB, Virnig BA

New aspects of vulvar cancer: changes in localization and age of onset

Author(s): Hampl M, Deckers-Figiel S, Hampl JA, Rein D, Bender HG

The impact of improving outcomes guidance on surgical management of vulval squamous cell cancer in southwest England (1997-2002)

Author(s): Falconer AD, Hirschowitz L, Weeks J, Murdoch J; South West Gynaecology Tumour Panel

Groin dissection practices among gynecologic oncologists treating early vulvar cancer

Author(s): Levenback C, Morris M, Burke TW, Gershenson DM, Wolf JK, et al.

A proposed glossary of terminology related to the surgical treatment of vulvar carcinoma

Author(s): Micheletti L, Preti M, Zola P, Zanotto Valentino MC, Bocci C, et al.

FIGO staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynecologic cancers

Author(s): Benedet JL, Bender H, Jones H 3rd, Ngan HY, Pecorelli S

Carcinoma of the vulva

Author(s): Rutledge F, Smith JP, Franklin EW

Squamous carcinoma of the vulva: results of treatment, 1938 to 1976

Author(s): Benedet JL, Turko M, Fairey RN, Boyes DA

Changing trends in the surgical treatment of invasive carcinoma of the vulva

Author(s): Cavanagh D, Roberts WS, Bryson SC, Marsden DE, Ingram JM, et al.

Management of regional lymph nodes and their prognostic influence in vulvar cancer

Author(s): Hacker NF, Berek JS, Lagasse LD, Leuchter RS, Moore JG

Clinical and pathological prognostic factors in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva

Author(s): Raspagliesi F, Hanozet F, Ditto A, Solima E, Zanaboni F, et al.

Carcinoma of the vulva

Author(s): Beller U, Quinn MA, Benedet JL, Creasman WT, Ngan HY

Changes in the management of vulval cancer

Author(s): Dhar KK, Woolas RP

Individualization of treatment for stage I squamous cell vulvar carcinoma

Author(s): Hacker NF, Berek JS, Lagasse LD, Nieberg RK, Leuchter RS