Author(s): Jacobsen JB, Boiesen JH, Thorsen BJ, Strange N
Valuing biodiversity is a key challenge to environmental economics, put into focus by policy developments everywhere, now increasingly focusing on habitat preservation. This paper addresses two questions as part of this challenge. Firstly, habitats as such - often in the form of particular landscapes - may be of value to people, i.e. independently of the value adhered to the species at risk in the particular habitat. Secondly, the question of how to present the biodiversity at risk to respondents is addressed. We design a choice experiment to investigate these questions in a setting where respondents are asked to evaluate the preservation of the Danish heath and its endangered species. Results indicate that the value of the habitat, the landscape itself, can be captured reasonably well in a specific attribute representing size of the habitat, and the parameter estimate of this attribute was little affected by changes in the biodiversity protection attribute. By simply naming and hence ‘iconising’ only a few species we received dramatically higher value estimates than when using a quantitative description. We conclude that using ‘iconised’ species for valuing biodiversity at habitat level may lead to very high, potentially overestimated, values of species preservation and we discuss which estimates to use in real-world conservation planning. The paper also contributes to the ongoing debate on embedding-issues, and the inclusion of a CV-question in the questionnaire allows an in-sample comparison with the choice experiment with regard to respondents’ ability to respond to scale.
Referred From: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10640-007-9107-6
Author(s): Laurans Y, Rankovic A, Billé R, Pirard R, Mermet L
Author(s): Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM
Author(s): Tu G, Abildtrup J, Garcia S
Author(s): Bolund P, Hunhammar S
Author(s): Elmqvist T, Setälä H, Handel SN, Van Der Ploeg S, Aronson J, et al.
Author(s): Brander LM, Koetse MJ
Author(s): Chiesura A
Author(s): Lupp G, Förster B, Kantelberg V, Markmann T, Naumann J, et al.
Author(s): Endreny T, Santagata R, Perna A, De Stefano C, Rallo RF, et al.
Author(s): Tyrväinen L, Silvennoinen H, Kolehmainen O
Author(s): Sanesi G, Colangelo G, Lafortezza R, Calvo E, Davies C
Author(s): Aasetre J, Gundersen V, Vistad OI, Holtrop EJ
Author(s): Horne P, Boxall PC, Adamowicz WL
Author(s): Pouwels R, Sierdsema H, Henkens RJHG, van Eupen M
Author(s): Balfors B, Mörtberg U, Gontier M, Brokking P
Author(s): Cole DN, Landres PB
Author(s): Sikorska D, Sikorski P, Hopkins RJ
Author(s): Puhakka R
Author(s): Christie M, Hanley N, Hynes S
Author(s): Juutinen A, Mitani Y, Mäntymaa E, Shoji Y, Siikamäki P, et al.
Author(s): Martinez-Alier J
Author(s): Parsons GR
Author(s): Shrestha RK, Seidl AF, Moraes, AS
Author(s): Hanley N, Wright RE, Adamowicz V
Author(s): Carson RT, Czajkowski M
Author(s): Bennett J, Blamey R
Author(s): Gnoumou A, Thiomboano A, Hahn-Hadjali K, Abadouabou B, Sarr M, et al.
Author(s): Louviere JJ, Street D, Burgess L, Wasi N, Islam T, et al.
Author(s): Bartkowski B, Lienhoop N, Hansjürgens B
Author(s): Christie M, Hanley N, Warren J, Murphy K, Wright R, et al.
Author(s): Pearce DW
Author(s): Birol E, Hanley N, Koundouri P, Kountouris Y
Author(s): Carlsson F, Frykblom P, Liljenstolpe C
Author(s): Chape S, Spalding M, Jenkins M
Author(s): Pickering CM, Hill W
Author(s): Morey ER
Author(s): Hanley N, Alvarez-Farizo B, Shaw WD
Author(s): Lancaster KJ
Author(s): Adamowicz W, Boxall P, Williams M, Louviere J
Author(s): Thurstone LL
Author(s): Baltas G, Doyle P
Author(s): Bonnieux F, Carpentier A
Author(s): Allenby GM, Rossi PE
Author(s): McFadden D, Train K
Author(s): Bech M, Gyrd-Hansen D
Author(s): Deng J, King B, Bauer T
Author(s): Le THT, Lee DK, Kim YS, Lee Y
Author(s): Cetin M, Sevik H
Author(s): Clawson M, Knetsch JL
Author(s): Jin Q, Hu H, Kavan P
Author(s): Lanz B, Dietz S, Swanson T
Author(s): Alvey AA