Opportunistic preventive services delivery: are time limitations and patient satisfaction barriers

Author(s): Stange K, Flocke S, Goodwin M


Background: The use of illness visits as opportunities to increase the delivery of preventive services has been widely recommended, but its feasibility in community practice is not known. We examined the prevalence of this opportunistic approach to providing preventive services, and the degree to which patient satisfaction and time limitation are barriers.

Methods: Consecutive patient illness visits to 138 community family physicians were directly observed. Visits by patients who received at least one preventive service recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force were compared with visits by patients not receiving any recommended preventive services, controlling for potentially confounding patient characteristics.

Results: Among 3547 illness visits, preventive services were delivered during 39% of visits for chronic illness and 30% of visits for acute illness. Opportunistic health habits counseling occurred more frequently than screening or immunization. Visit satisfaction reported by 2454 patients using the Medical Outcomes Survey 9-item Visit Rating Scale was not different during illness visits with or without the delivery of preventive services. The duration of illness visits that included preventive services was an average of 2.1 minutes longer than illness visits without such interventions (95% confidence interval, 1.7-2.4).

Conclusions: The delivery of preventive services during illness visits is common in community practice and is well accepted by patients. The expansion of an opportunistic approach to providing preventive services will require attention to time-efficient approaches.

Similar Articles

Substance-related problems in patients visiting an urban Canadian emergency department

Author(s): Brubacher JR, Mabie A, Ngo M, Abu-Laban RB, Buchanan J, et al.

Feasibility of screening and intervention for alcohol problems among young adults in the ED

Author(s): Hungerford DW, Williams JM, Furbee PM, Manley WG, Helmkamp JC, et al.

Rapid follow-up for patients after psychiatric crisis

Author(s): McCullumsmith C, Clark B, Blair C, Cropsey K, Shelton R

A review of research on the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)

Author(s): Allen JP, Litten RZ, Fertig JB, Babor T

Evaluating the effects of a brief motivational intervention for injury drinkers in the Emergency Department

Author(s): Longabaugh R, Woolard RF, Nirenberg TD, Minugh AP, Becker B, et al.

Establishing treatment relations with alcoholics

Author(s): Chafetz ME, Blane HT, Abrams HS, Golner JH, Lacy E, et al.

The early history of ideas on brief interventions for alcohol

Author(s): McCambridge J, Cunningham JA

Individual and system influences on waiting time for substance abuse treatment

Author(s): Carr CJA, Xu J, Redko C, Lane DT, Rapp RC, et al.

Treatment barriers identified by substance abusers assessed at a centralized intake unit

Author(s): Rapp RC, Xu J, Carr CA, Lane DT, Wang J, et al.

Follow-up services after an emergency department visit for substance abuse

Author(s): Breton AR, Taira DA, Burns E, O´Leary J, Chung RS

Intervention by an alcohol health worker in an accident and emergency department

Author(s): Wright S, Moran L, Meyrick M, O’Connor R, Touquet R

Intervention attendance among Emergency Department patients with alcohol- and drug-use disorders

Author(s): Blow FC, Walton MA, Murray R, Cunningham RM, Chermack ST, et al.

Categorical Data Analysis using the SAS System

Author(s): Stokes ME, Davis CS, Koch GG