Author(s): De Alba I, Anton-Culver H, Hubbell FA, Ziogas A, Hess JR, et al.
Background: The aim of the study was (a) to assess sensitivity and specificity of self-sampling in a community setting for identifying high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and abnormal Papanicolaou (Pap) smears and (b) to assess satisfaction with this collection method among Hispanic women.
Methods: Lay health workers distributed self-collection kits to Hispanic women in the community. Participants collected an unsupervised vaginal sample at home or in the place and time of their preference.
Results: A total of 1,213 Hispanics were included and provided a self-sample for HPV testing and were invited for a Pap smear; 662 (55%) of them had a Pap smear and the first 386 of these also had a physician-collected sample for HPV retesting. Using physician collection as the gold standard, unsupervised self-collection had a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 88% for identifying high-risk HPV. Compared with physician sampling, self-sampling in a community setting had comparable sensitivity for identifying a low-grade lesions or greater in the Pap smear (50% versus 55%; P = 0.45) but lower specificity (94% versus 79%). Overall experience with self-sampling was reported as excellent or very good by 64% and only 2.6% reported a poor or fair experience.
Conclusions: Unsupervised self-collection of vaginal samples for HPV testing in a community setting has a high sensitivity for identifying high-risk HPV and a high satisfaction among Hispanics. This approach may benefit populations with limited access to health care or with cultural barriers to cervical cancer screening.
Referred From: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18708409
Author(s): Safaeian M, Kiddugavu M, Gravitt PE, Ssekasanvu J, Murokora D, et al.
Author(s): Lack N, West B, Jeffries D, Ekpo G, Morison L, et al.
Author(s): Jones HE, Wiegerinck MA, Nieboer TE, Mol BW, Westhoff CL
Author(s): Deleré Y, Schuster M, Vartazarowa E, Hänsel T, Hagemann I, et al.
Author(s): Petignat P, Faltin DL, Bruchim I, Tramèr MR, Franco EL, et al.
Author(s): Mollers M, Scherpenisse M, van der Klis FR, King AJ, van Rossum TG, et al.
Author(s): Chranioti A, Aga E, Margari N, Kottaridi C, Pappas A, et al.
Author(s): Bouvard V, Baan R, Straif K, Grosse Y, Secretan B, et al.
Author(s): Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, Moriarty A, O'Connor D, et al.
Author(s): Petignat P, Hankins C, Walmsley S, Money D, Provencher D, et al.
Author(s): Jones HE, Allan BR, van de Wijgert JH, Altini L, Taylor SM, et al.
Author(s): Kahn JA, Slap GB, Huang B, Rosenthal SL, Wanchick AM, et al.
Author(s): Karwalajtys T, Howard M, Sellors JW, Kaczorowski J
Author(s): Agorastos T, Dinas K, Lloveras B, Font R, Kornegay JR, et al.
Author(s): Baldwin S, Santos C, Mendez Brown E, Nuño T, Giuliano A, et al.
Author(s): Snijders PJ, Verhoef VM, Arbyn M, Ogilvie G, Minozzi S, et al.
Author(s): Castle PE, Rodriguez AC, Porras C, Herrero R, Schiffman M, et al.
Author(s): Igidbashian S, Boveri S, Spolti N, Radice D, Sandri MT, et al.
Author(s): Sellors JW, Lorincz AT, Mahony JB, Mielzynska I, Lytwyn A, et al.
Author(s): Enerly E, Olofsson C, Nygård M
Author(s): Szarewski A, Cadman L, Ashdown-Barr L, Waller J
Author(s): Petignat P, Vassilakos P
Author(s): Widdice LE, Moscicki AB
Author(s): American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists