Leiomyosarcoma of the uterus: A clinicopathologic multicenter study of 71 cases

Author(s): Mayerhofer K, Obermair A, Windbichler G

Abstract

Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the behavior of uterine leiomyosarcomas in relation to their clinical and pathologic features and to identify possible prognostic factors.

Methods. Seventy-one patients with histologically proven uterine leiomyosarcoma were included in the analysis. Leiomyosarcomas were defined as uterine smooth-muscle tumors with five or more mitoses per 10 high-power fields and cytologic atypia. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify independent prognostic factors.

Results. The median follow-up time was 108 months; 5-year overall survival rate was 65%. Evaluating the correlation between several clinicopathologic parameters, tumors with vascular space involvement had a statistically significantly higher stage than tumors without vasular space involvement (P = 0.015). In a univariate Cox model early tumor stage (P < 0.0001), age <50 years (P < 0.0001), low mitotic count (P = 0.05), and the absence of vascular space involvement (P < 0.0005) were associated with good prognosis. In a multivariate analysis age (P = 0.002), tumor stage (P = 0.004), vascular space involvement (P = 0.003), and mitotic count in stage I tumors (P = 0.002) were found to be independent parameters for good prognosis in patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma.

Similar Articles

Malignant transformation of leiomyoma of uterus to leiomyosarcoma with metastasis to ovary

Author(s): Bharambe BM, Deshpande KA, Surase SG, Ajmera AP

Malignant transition of uterine leiomyomata

Author(s): Rotmensch J, Bosnyak S, Montag A

Leiomyosarcoma of the skin and subcutaneous tissue

Author(s): Fields JP, Helwig EB

Leiomyosarcoma of the skin, treatment of 34 cases

Author(s): Bernstein SC, Roenigk RK

Superficial leiomyosarcoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery

Author(s): Humphreys TR, Finkelstein DH, Lee JB

Primary leiomyosarcoma of the skin: A comprehensive review on diagnosis and treatment

Author(s): Zacher M, Heppt MV, Brinker TJ, Hayani KM, Flaig MJ, et al.